Advertisement

Nothing ordinary about artist's eye I was barely...

October 22, 2004

Nothing ordinary about artist's eye

I was barely halfway through the first sentence of the Coastline

Pilot's Oct. 15 editorial ("Taking the art out of public places")

when I recognized the timeworn "I may not know that much about art,

but I know my kid could do better" tenor that the following

paragraphs would assume.

It seems that sculptural depictions of a woman shopper and a group

Advertisement

of people engaged in discussion is not discerning enough to qualify

for public art funding as far as the editorial staff is concerned

because this sort of thing happens every day in real life. This sort

of logic would also thus demand that there is no reason for any sort

of art that depicts anything with which we might be familiar.

Art is representation, whether it assumes the guise of the

abstract, the conceptual or the faithful rendering of the real. One

possible aim of an effort to represent the familiar might be to

elicit some degree of contemplation of what is easily taken for

granted -- in other words, encouraging seeing instead of merely

looking.

The editorial asks whether an overabundance of art in public

places would diminish its aesthetic worth and make the experience

"ordinary." Perhaps this is what is required to transform the

ordinary into the extraordinary.

CLAYTON SPADA

Laguna Beach

Vilification of our public servants

Shouldn't we be concerned about the level of anger in our

political system these days?

Thanks to those who have chosen to volunteer to do service for our

city and run for office in the past, Laguna Beach is acknowledged to

be one of the best run and financed cities in all of California. But

if you've tuned in to the City Council proceedings on Tuesday

evenings on our cable channel 30 or, better yet, attended a meeting

at City Hall, you'd never know how truly fortunate we are.

The case of Councilman Wayne Baglin is a good example of what's

wrong. After more than 30 years of public service to the city during

which he was awarded and commended for his efforts and was

responsible for many of the amenities and activities that we enjoy as

residents, he was forced to spend tens of thousands of his own

dollars to defend himself against a suit brought against him for

political purposes.

Then, even after the jury and the courts acknowledged his

innocence, these same sorts of people, the ones who apparently have

nothing to do in life but complain, are now trying to tarnish his

exemplary reputation and have joined with others to form a political

Coastline Pilot Articles
|
|
|