“I agree with the commission,” said Councilman Kelly Boyd. “They can build without a variance, and the variance is something we have not allowed in the city: a street beyond 750 feet.”
Individual neighbors, representatives of neighborhood associations, Village Laguna, South Laguna Civic Assn. and Laguna Greenbelt Inc. spoke in opposition to the extension.
“I think every environmental group except the Surfriders opposes this project,” Pike attorney Tom Davis said.
Davis presented a 1½-inch thick packet of documents that included a list of actions and studies undertaken to move the project along.
“They have done everything asked of them,” Davis said.
However, the commission could not make the required justification for the road extension.
“Commissioners were concerned with the inconsistencies with the general plan and other policies,” City Planner Scott Drapkin said.
The commission’s recommended denial of the extension precluded it from consideration of the portion of the application that related to the sub-division of the property and request for a coastal development permit.
“This has been before us for a long time,” said Mayor Pro Tem Cheryl Kinsman. “They always propose something the city wants to deny. I believe the commission was correct.”
The Pikes had previously submitted subdivision proposals to the city and been denied.
The proposal prior to the one presented at the meeting went into litigation that culminated in a settlement in 2001.
In his background summary, Community Development Director John Montgomery said that the agreement provided that the property owner could process a subdivision map for three residential lots, together with applications for the necessary permits and variances, and if approved, required the property owner to dedicate a fourth parcel, abutting Park Avenue, to open space.