“I don’t think we have done all we can for the residents,” Councilwoman Verna Rollinger said.
Rollinger and Mayor Pro Tem Toni Iseman voted against the approval of the map and coastal development permit, as recommended by the Planning Commission, which was advised of the state restrictions by City Atty. Philip Kohn, as was the council.
Iseman likened the conversion to buying a “pig in a poke,” a colloquialism referring to the purchase of an unknown object without a thorough investigation.
“The 3-2 vote was more entertaining than a boring 5-0 vote,” park manager Jim Lawson said. “But I am very happy to have the tentative tract map.”
Iseman was concerned about reports she had gotten that many of the park residents would not be able to keep up with increases in rents. She is hoping a fund will be set up for any displaced residents.
Residents will have the option of buying or continuing to rent, according to specific requirements of the government code dealing with sub-divisions.
“Those that don’t buy, can’t be evicted,” said Boyce Belt, speaking on behalf of residents.
“A homeowner’s association will be formed when the conversion takes place — and that is when the first lot is sold.”
Iseman challenged Belt’s residency, asking if he lived in Newport Beach or Laguna. The answer was both.
“I might be known as trailer trash,” Belt said.
Rollinger also objected to the city’s position that the park is not included in the areas of the property subject to review by the California Coastal Commission of projects on the site.