Rollinger opined that the public should be presented with the facts and allowed to make the decision on a project that has been on and off the drawing board for more than 25 years.
"The public has not weighed in on this since I was on the council," Rollinger said.
Pearson agreed that time had faded memories of what had transpired and agreed on in the past.
"People need to be reeducated," said Pearson, who sponsored the proposal to reestablish the subcommittee.
Pearson said she and Iseman represent people with different points of view, and their recommendations would provide a starting point for a public workshop.
"We will be starting with the premise of a park, a walking path, increased parking, and we will make it prettier," Iseman said.
Pearson has been working on the Village Entrance for 14 years, starting when she was a planning commissioner. She and Iseman began working together in 2004 when they were appointed to the original subcommittee by then-Mayor Cheryl Kinsman.
Kinsman basically told them to lock heads until they reached an agreement.
Folks who knew the political and philosophical differences between the subcommittee members held little hope they could reach a compromise. The chasm seemed unbridgeable between environmentalists' opposition to moving the city corporation yard into the undeveloped side of Laguna Canyon to make way for a parking structure downtown that the business and the civic arts district communities wanted.
However, the two councilwomen hammered out a compromise, which was presented at a well-attended workshop on Jan. 15, 2005.
"We broke the logjam that had been causing the problems for years," said Iseman.
Among the compromise proposals approved then by the council: